13 September 2007, 10:26am
13 September 2007
As the UK's Association for Geographic Information annual conference rapidly approaches (19-20 September), Michael Cross, of the UK's Guardian newspaper, leader of a national "Free our data" campaign, sets out the latest information on the whereabouts of the proposed UK GI Strategy recommendation report - now renamed "The Location Strategy for the UK" - which is supposedly with the responsible minister for comment.
Read more at the "Free our data" site:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/
sep/13/guardianweeklytechnologysection.freeourdata
Interestingly, there is nothing in the AGI's conference programme to indicate that the UK national Strategy (GI or Location) will be discussed or debated in public session - yet again. Presentations are listed for "international lessons learned" and on the excellent Northern Ireland regional SDI and INSPIRE 'implications' - but not on the UK's own national SDI strategy (excuse me, Location Strategy).
At a time when the pan-European SDI INSPIRE Directive has now come into force, and its legal provisions on implementing spatial data infrastructure will apply equally to all EU Member States, one would have thought that a national GI/Location strategy would be of some priority.
Source: Roger Longhorn, Editor, GEO:connexion International
.gif)
Each month we select a hot topic and a leading figure in the industry to write about it.What message are we sending to senior level decision makers about the importance and value of Spatial Data Infrastructure - SDI - if we keep misrepresenting what SDI is or is all about?
In previous editorials in this magazine I have touched on various SDI issues, especially now that the pan-European SDI has achieved a legally mandated status within the European Union's 27 Member States. Yet I fear that the Geographic Information community - or communities, for there are many - continue to… More…
Roger Longhorn